vertical vessel piping _first rest support

116 views
Skip to first unread message

Chiranjeevi A

unread,
Jul 17, 2019, 3:37:57 AM7/17/19
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear all,

  Please find the below, sulfur absorber vessel, The following pipe mtl is A335 P11 and thk. = 14.27mm. The vertical portion is 3.8m only, immediately on the rack we have rest support

   If the vertical portion is long i.e if it about 15m and above, we have to provide rest support either rigid or spring in vertical portion.

As per below snap small vertical vessel and the pipe size 12" sch 60 we have more span. Providing support and if not in the vertical portion doesnt impacting the nozzle loads. The nozzle loads are Fx=Fy=Fz=18Tons and Mx=15tons, My=Mz=7tons. In my point of view first rest support is not required in this case, kinldy share your opinions 

image.png


Chiranjeevi A

unread,
Jul 17, 2019, 12:24:06 PM7/17/19
to material...@googlegroups.com

Hemant W Joshi

unread,
Jul 17, 2019, 12:24:06 PM7/17/19
to material...@googlegroups.com

Do not know if your vertical support consisting of lugs is practically possible without incurring extra supporting costs.

The nozzle loads appear to be quite high.

Morever it is not clear how much is the overall pipe length in the horizontal direction for locating the rest support.  The vertical length of 3.8m has a dead load (empty) of 500 kg. overall considering even the horizontal length dead load . the load does not appear too much .

Hence the rest support looks okay unless it is located beyond the permissible span.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAN4%2Bm0zTa3T%3DuWCvPQ2WUAYvuXMyOtoo1T3wUJigFZ%3D9h27Q6g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Information transmitted by this E-MAIL is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) and contains information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination and or copying of this email in any manner is strictly prohibited and you are requested to delete this e-mail immediately. Communicating through e-mail is not secure and capable of interception and delays. Any one communicating with TATA Consulting Engineers Ltd., and / or its subsidiaries or associates or group companies by e-mail accepts the risks involved and their consequences. While this e-mail has been checked for all known viruses, the addressee should also scan for viruses and notify the originator of e-mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

George Dilintas

unread,
Jul 17, 2019, 12:24:09 PM7/17/19
to material...@googlegroups.com
did you run flexibility calculations? If you get zero reactions at this support for all loading conditions including pressure test, then you may remove it

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAN4%2Bm0zTa3T%3DuWCvPQ2WUAYvuXMyOtoo1T3wUJigFZ%3D9h27Q6g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Dr. Georgios Dilintas,
Dipl. Ing. In Aeronautic and Space Engineering
Ph.D in Mechanics of Solids - Computational Mechanics
A.I.S, A.N.I, IRCA Lead Auditor
Welding, Stress Analysis, Corrosion, QA/QC, Failure Analysis, Risk Analysis

Chiranjeevi A

unread,
Jul 17, 2019, 11:04:06 PM7/17/19
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Hemant,

   The horizontal spool length is just 2m and vertical = 3.8m. Hence deleted the support because we have immediate rest support on rack structure. 
  

Chiranjeevi A

unread,
Jul 17, 2019, 11:04:14 PM7/17/19
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Georgios,

   We run the flexibility analysis check, since it a small vertical vessel will “Grow” up due to the thermal expansion created by the process temperature & the pipe will grow down thus equalizing some of the vessel vertical “ growth”. 

   If the vertical columns of length about 15m and above we have to give rigid support near to nozzle. In this case, we verified all the required parameters in flexibility analysis and deleted support.



Hemant W Joshi

unread,
Jul 18, 2019, 1:28:17 AM7/18/19
to material...@googlegroups.com

To shri Chiranjeevi A

Yes I meant that the rest support on the pipe rack may be kept.


For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Chiranjeevi A

unread,
Jul 18, 2019, 1:28:17 AM7/18/19
to material...@googlegroups.com


Dear all

Chiranjeevi A

unread,
Jul 18, 2019, 11:28:39 PM7/18/19
to material...@googlegroups.com
Thank you hemant, I kept the support on pipe rack, deleted the support in vertical. 

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages